top of page

Drake's "72 Hour Rule": The Psychology Behind Forgetting


Maintaining a relevant presence in the public eye can be challenging in the fast-paced world of music and entertainment. In a landscape where news and trends change at the speed of a tweet, artists constantly seek strategies to capture and retain audience attention. One such strategy that emerged from the mind of the Canadian rapper Drake is what he has referred to as the "72 Hour Rule." This intriguing concept suggests that allowing a controversial or attention-grabbing moment to simmer for three days is likely to fade away from public consciousness. However, is there any merit to this idea? Let us explore the psychology behind Drake's "72 Hour Rule."

The "72 Hour Rule" gained attention after Drake mentioned it in an interview, shedding light on how he navigates the ebbs and flows of his career and public image. The concept proposes that the intense buzz surrounding a particular event or statement will naturally diminish after 72 hours, allowing the artist or individual at the centre of attention to move forward without being haunted by the past.

To understand the underlying psychology of Drake's "72 Hour Rule," it is essential to consider the mechanisms that govern human attention and memory. The human brain is remarkably adept at processing vast amounts of information but also filters out what it deems less relevant. This filtering mechanism is closely tied to the novelty of information. When a new and attention-grabbing piece of information surfaces, it triggers heightened neural activity and emotional responses. However, these responses tend to wane over time as the brain acclimates to the stimulus.

The phenomenon of forgetting is a crucial component here. Our memories are malleable and subject to interference from subsequent events. As new information and experiences flood in, older memories can be pushed to the periphery of our awareness. This natural tendency to forget plays into the effectiveness of Drake's "72-Hour Rule."

Drake's rule also capitalises on how modern society is inundated with constant news and content. New and captivating events quickly replace older ones in an environment where attention spans are shorter than ever. This principle is commonly observed in the news cycle, where the next big story can swiftly overshadow headlines that once dominated conversations.

The "72 Hour Rule" aligns with the dynamics of this news cycle, allowing individuals and artists to essentially ride out the initial storm of attention until the next wave of news comes crashing in. This is not to say that the original event is entirely forgotten but that its intensity diminishes as the public's attention shifts elsewhere.

Social media platforms are pivotal in disseminating information and shaping public perception. Trends and controversies can spread like wildfire on these platforms, but they can also be short-lived due to the constant influx of new content. The "72-Hour Rule" acknowledges the rapid pace of social media intuitively and suggests that if an individual can weather the initial storm of attention, the intensity of the scrutiny will naturally subside.

While the "72-hour rule" might not be a foolproof strategy for every situation, there is an element of truth to its underlying psychological principles. The human brain's tendency to habituate to stimuli and the constant influx of new information on platforms like social media contribute to the fading of attention over time. However, the rule's efficacy can vary depending on the gravity of the event, the depth of emotional impact, and the subsequent actions taken by the individual involved.

Drake's "72 Hour Rule" taps into the intricate interplay between human attention, memory, and the rapid pace of modern information consumption. While it might not guarantee complete oblivion of a controversial event, it suggests that time and the relentless march of news can soften the edges of even the most headline-grabbing moments. As the entertainment industry continues to evolve, strategies like these shed light on the evolving relationship between celebrities and their audience in the age of digital media.

ree

The Girke Group, Melbourne
Luke Girke

lukegirke@gmail.com 
0417 058 305

 

Amparable | Athsthetics | Skills & Drills |
Spearman Ministry | ProceedClean | The Phitlosophy Podcast
UNSTPABL. | FotoLuxe | Trim&Bin 


© 2025 The Girke Group Melbourne. 

Website Designed by Luke Girke in collaboration with The Girke Group Management.

Website

The information provided by The Girke Group (‘we’, ‘us’, or ‘our’) on http://www.girke.com.au (the ‘Site’) and our mobile application is for general informational purposes only. All information on the Site and our mobile application is provided in good faith, however we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information on the Site our or mobile application. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL WE HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF THE SITE OR OUR MOBILE APPLICATION OR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE SITE AND OUR APPLICATION. YOUR USE OF THE SITE AND OUR MOBILE APPLICATION AND YOUR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION ON THE SITE AND OUR MOBILE APPLICATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. 

 

Professional Liability

The Site cannot and does not contain medical/health, legal, and fitness advice. The medical/health, legal, and fitness information is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Accordingly, before taking any actions based upon such information, we encourage you to consult with the appropriate professionals. We not provide any kind of medical/health, legal, and fitness advice. THE USE OR RELIANCE OF ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE SITE OR OUR MOBILE APPLICATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. 

 

Testimonials  

The Site may contain testimonials by users of our products and/or services. These testimonials reflect the real-life experiences and opinions of such users. However, the experiences are personal to those particular users, and may not necessarily be representative of all users of our products and/or services. We do not claim, and you should not assume, that all users will have the same experiences. YOUR INDIVIDUAL RESULTS MAY VARY.  The testimonials on the Site are submitted in various forms such as text, audio, and/or video, and are reviewed by us before being posted. They appear on the Site verbatim as given by the users, except for the correction of grammar or typing errors. Some testimonials may have been shortened for the sake of brevity where the full testimonial contained extraneous information not relevant to the general public. The views and opinions contained in the testimonials belong solely to the individual user and do not reflect our views and opinions. We are not affiliated with users who provide testimonials, and users are not paid or otherwise compensated for their testimonials.

Blog

Articles on this website are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any diseases. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have not evaluated these articles. All information available on the website and blog is for educational purposes only. A qualified healthcare professional should be consulted before implementing any fitness, health, or nutritional protocol provided in the blog. Additionally, the articles containing material related to the law, legalities, or the legal profession are exploratory only and are not legal advice.

bottom of page